<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook is a Time&#160;Machine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arunhasablog.com/2009/03/28/facebook-is-a-time-machine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arunhasablog.com/2009/03/28/facebook-is-a-time-machine/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2018 07:24:41 +0800</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Wang</title>
		<link>http://www.arunhasablog.com/2009/03/28/facebook-is-a-time-machine/comment-page-1/#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen Wang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arunhasablog.com/?p=388#comment-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t that just because of the vagueness of the terms today and tomorrow thanks to modern timekeeping? For example, if it were March 31, but then it passed midnight, the date April 1 could be considered â€œtomorrow.â€ And so if I post shortly after midnight with a timestamp of April 1, the relevant date rendered into something more vernacular can be considered â€œtomorrow.â€

I noticed the same phenomenon happening somewhat recently, too, and just kinda believed it was because of something like this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that just because of the vagueness of the terms today and tomorrow thanks to modern timekeeping? For example, if it were March 31, but then it passed midnight, the date April 1 could be considered â€œtomorrow.â€ And so if I post shortly after midnight with a timestamp of April 1, the relevant date rendered into something more vernacular can be considered â€œtomorrow.â€</p>
<p>I noticed the same phenomenon happening somewhat recently, too, and just kinda believed it was because of something like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
